Category: court ruling

Federal Circuit’s Dropbox Decision: Missing the Forest for the Trees?

Saturday | June 20, 2020By Shane Skwarekabstract ideacourt rulingpatent claimpatent eligibilitysoftware patent

On June 19, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the invalidation of three Dropbox patents. The Northern District of California had granted a motion to dismiss on grounds that the claims in those patents were…

Read More

Sequenom’s More Specific Claims Survive

Monday | March 23, 2020By Shane Skwarek§ 101court rulingdiagnostic methodlitigationpatent draftingpatent eligibilitySequenomtips for inventors

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit took another look at Sequenom's techniques for detecting fetal blood cells in a maternal blood sample. In Illumina Inc. & Sequenom, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., No. 2019-1419, 2020 U.S. App.…

Read More

Customedia Techs. Patent for Storing Ads Invalidated

Saturday | March 14, 2020By Shane Skwarek35 U.S.C. § 101court rulingpatent applicationpatent eligibilityPatent Protectionpatentability searchsoftware patentsubject-matter eligibility

Patent claims to storing ad data based on user preferences locally at a user's video player were confirmed invalid in Customedia Techs., LLC v. Dish Network Corp., No. 2018-2239, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 7005 (Fed. Cir. March 6, 2020). To…

Read More

Federal Circuit Holds Making Liners for Driveshafts Doesn’t Practically Apply Laws of Nature

Monday | October 7, 2019By Shane Skwarekcourt rulingfederal circuitpatent eligibility

The trend in the U.S. for courts to invalidate growing numbers of patents, particularly software, business method, and medical diagnostic patents, as being directed to unpatentable abstract ideas, laws of nature, and natural phenomena has found its way to mechanical…

Read More

Early Dismissal on § 101 Grounds Is Improper When Claims Need Construction

Tuesday | August 20, 2019By Shane Skwarekcourt rulingpatent infringement

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in MyMail v. ooVoo, No. 2018-1758, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 24430 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2019), that a court must adopt a non-moving party's claim constructions or otherwise resolve claim construction…

Read More

Computer-Centric Details Critical to Success in Uniloc Decision

Monday | June 3, 2019By Shane Skwarekcourt rulingpatent claimspatent infringement

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit confirmed the invalidation of claims in two patents, and reversed the district court’s finding that two other patents in the same family were invalid for lack of subject-matter ineligibility, in Uniloc…

Read More

Win Some, Lose Some

Saturday | May 4, 2019By Shane Skwarekcourt rulingpatent claimspatent infringement

In February of 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential opinion finding that claims involving an improvement to a GUI for software that enabled traders to place orders at a particular price level (not…

Read More

Is Everyone Skeptical of the U.S. Patent Office’s New Guidelines?

Wednesday | April 10, 2019By Shane Skwarekcourt rulingpatent claimspatent infringement

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently cast doubt on the 2019 Updated Guidelines on Subject-Matter Eligibility issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. In Fed. Circuit Cleveland Clinic Found. v. True Health Diagnostics LLC, No.…

Read More

Federal Circuit Finds Method of Treatment Claims Patent-Eligible in Natural Alternatives

Tuesday | March 26, 2019By Shane Skwarekcourt rulingpatent claimspatent eligibility

In Natural Alternatives Int’l, Inc. v. Creative Compounds, LLC, No. 2018-1295, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 7647 (Fed. Cir. Mar 15, 20190, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found claims to administering a dosage of beta-alanine to a…

Read More

Top 5 Reasons for Outsourcing Legal Services

Friday | March 8, 2019By Shane Skwarekcourt rulingpatent claimspatent infringement

The best in-house legal counsel does not just outsource legal work for cheaper foreign labor. They also outsource legal work for expert work done domestically. This transfer of work is called legal process outsourcing. The most recent trend in this space…

Read More
Load More